Complete article archive
260 published articles · Showing 25–36 · Newest first
Fortinet Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CVE-2025-25249)
A heap-based buffer overflow in FortiOS, FortiSwitchManager, and FortiSASE allows for unauthorized code execution via crafted packets. This analysis focuses on asset identification and mitigation assurance.
Read article →Chromium V8 Out of Bounds Write (CVE-2026-87491)
A vulnerability in the Chromium V8 engine allows remote arbitrary code execution within the browser sandbox via crafted HTML pages, affecting multiple Chromium-based browsers.
Read article →Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Authentication Bypass (CVE-2026-20079)
A critical authentication bypass vulnerability in Cisco FMC and SCC Firewall Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain root access. CISA has added this to the KEV catalog, necessitating immediate identification of exposed assets and forensic triage.
Read article →Arbitrary Code Execution in Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source (CVE-2026-75650)
Analysis of CVE-2026-75650, a template engine vulnerability in Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source that may allow arbitrary code execution. Focuses on remediation verification and forensic triage requirements.
Read article →Microsoft Windows Update Stack Local Privilege Escalation (CVE-2026-81963)
A link following vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows Update Stack allows local attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. Vulnerability management teams should prioritize assets based on risk and verify remediation via vendor-supported updates.
Read article →N-able N-central Pre-Authentication Remote Code Execution (CVE-2026-86218)
A static code injection vulnerability in N-able N-central allows for pre-authentication remote code execution. This analysis details the exposure and verification requirements for infrastructure owners.
Read article →Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Heap Overflow (CVE-2026-85880)
A heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call (ALPC) mechanism allows for local privilege escalation. This analysis details remediation priorities and validation methods for reducing exposure.
Read article →Denial-of-Service Vulnerabilities in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic
Four vulnerabilities in RSLinx Classic versions 4.50 and earlier allow remote attackers to crash the service using crafted CIP packets. Update to version 4.60 to mitigate these risks.
Read article →Rockwell Automation Historian ME Remote Code Execution and DoS Vulnerabilities
Two vulnerabilities in Rockwell Automation Historian ME (Series B 5.202 and Series C 7.101) could allow remote code execution or denial-of-service attacks via authenticated requests.
Read article →Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rockwell Automation PLC Product Lines
A critical loop vulnerability (CVE-2021-42260) affecting multiple Rockwell Automation controller families can lead to major nonrecoverable faults. This analysis details the affected firmware versions and the specific recovery requirements for safety versus non-safety controllers.
Read article →Rockwell Automation Logix Platform DoS Vulnerability CVE-2026-9637
A critical input validation vulnerability in Rockwell Automation Logix platforms can trigger a major nonrecoverable fault (MNRF), necessitating a physical power cycle for recovery.
Read article →DLL Hijacking Vulnerabilities in Rockwell Automation Redundancy Module Configuration Tool
Two vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-9633 and CVE-2026-9634) allow local privilege escalation to Administrator/SYSTEM levels via incorrect default permissions in the Rockwell Automation Redundancy Module Configuration Tool.
Read article →Page 3 of 22. This archive includes every published article; drafts and articles still processing are not public.
From government advisory to practical action
Vulnerability Assurance turns government cybersecurity reporting into original articles written for the people responsible for fixing vulnerabilities. Each analysis connects the source information to the decisions, corrective actions, and verification steps that matter in an affected environment.
Latest analysis
What our articles cover
- What happened: the vulnerability, the affected technology, and what the available evidence establishes.
- Who needs to act: relevant versions, configurations, exposure conditions, and operational dependencies.
- How to mitigate it: applicable patches, configuration changes, or compensating controls, with important limitations.
- How to verify the result: checks and retesting that can demonstrate whether the affected condition or exposure remains.
- What remains unresolved: uncertainty, residual risk, and follow-up work.
Analysis you can use here
Government advisories provide the evidence behind our reporting. Our articles explain that evidence in context and add practical mitigation and validation guidance. Source citations support the analysis; they do not replace it.
Turn security intelligence into action.
Discuss your exposure, priorities, and the evidence needed to validate the outcome.
Request a security assessment ↗